LUO Gang, PAN Shao-kang, ZHOU Xiao-jun, CHEN Jian-xun, DAI Bing-qiang
China Journal of Highway and Transport. 2018, 31(6): 244-253.
To study the regularity of the kinematics and dynamics of a submerged floating tunnel (SFT) subjected to near-field non-contact underwater explosions, fluid-solid coupling was employed and the problem of how to simulate a flow field with strong discontinuities was considered using the Arbitrary Lagrange Euler (ALE) coupling method. Explosive gas and water pressures were simulated using the Jones-Wilkins-Lee (JWL) and Mie-Gruenisen equations, respectively. To calculate the aforementioned problems, the LS-DYNA finite element kinetics program based on the potential flow theory and boundary element method was adopted. This study investigated the effects of three support systems (vertical, inclined, and combine the two cases) as well as the explosive quality and distance to the explosion center based on the displacement, velocity, acceleration, and stress of the SFT. The results indicated that after a non-contact explosion, the three support systems had a slightly different effects on the displacement, velocity, acceleration, and stress of the SFT. The cable axial force of the vertical support system was considerably less than that of the other two cases under the same explosive load. Compared with that of the vertical support system, the maximum cable axial force of the combined and inclined support systems was 296% and 283% higher, respectively. The displacement, velocity, and stress of the SFT increased linearly with increased explosive quality, and the acceleration was approximated by a parabolic increase. The accelerations of the SFT at midspan caused by the 200 kg and 500 kg explosives were 26.2% and 223% greater, respectively, than the acceleration caused by the 100 kg explosives. The explosive quality was a key factor that affected the security and stability of the SFT structure. The displacement, velocity, acceleration, and stress of the SFT experienced a reduction in power function with the increase in distance to the explosion center. In terms of acceleration, compared with the 2 m distance to the explosion center, the acceleration peaks were reduced by 73.2%, 94.2%, and 97.5% under the 5 m, 10 m, and 20 m operating conditions, respectively. In addition, the allowable explosive quality and safety distance were calculated by regression analysis and by using a fitting function, which provided a basis for a security evaluation of the SFT under a non-contact underwater explosion load.