Quasi-static Test and Numerical Simulation Analysis for Seismic Performance of Fabricated Assemble Bridge Piers Base on Bellows Connection(in English)

BAO Long-sheng, ZHANG Yuan-bao, SANG Zhong-wei, YU Ling

China Journal of Highway and Transport ›› 2018, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12) : 242-249.

PDF Full Text Download(4340 KB)
PDF Full Text Download(4340 KB)
China Journal of Highway and Transport ›› 2018, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12) : 242-249.

Quasi-static Test and Numerical Simulation Analysis for Seismic Performance of Fabricated Assemble Bridge Piers Base on Bellows Connection(in English)

  • BAO Long-sheng, ZHANG Yuan-bao, SANG Zhong-wei, YU Ling
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to study the difference in seismic performance between assembled piers connected with grouting bellows and overall cast-in-place piers; the mechanical properties of prefabricated two-column piers were explored under earthquake action, and the damage mechanism of the nodes were observed. The displacement hysteresis curves of the assembled piers connected with grouting bellows and the overall cast-in-place piers were obtained through a quasi-static test. The contrast study on the seismic performance of assembled piers connected with grouting bellows and cast-in-place piers were conducted via displacement ductility analyses, energy dissipation capacity analyses, and residual displacement analyses of the specimens. The resulting hysteresis curve shows the following:①The test piece of the grouting bellows is consistent with the overall cast-in-place test piece. The maximum bearing capacity of the assembled specimen is 6.7% lower than that of the cast-in-place test piece. ②The two skeleton curves show that the errors of yield load and ultimate load are less than 10%; the yield displacement is the same but the limit displacement of the assembly specimen is 3% lower than that of the cast-in-place test piece; the ductility coefficient of the grouting bellows specimen is less than that of the overall cast-in-place test piece. ③The residual displacement shows that the maximum residual displacements of both specimens are approximately 55 mm, but the corrugated pipe grouting specimen's residual displacement rate is greater than that of the cast-in-place specimen; the residual displacement of the cast-in-place specimen is approximately 90% of that of the grouting bellows test piece under the same hysteresis displacement. ④By means of the integral method, the energy dissipation capacity of the two test specimens can be compared. When the hysteresis displacement reaches 80 mm, the energy dissipation value is maximal, which is equal to 10.87 kN·m, and the total energy dissipation capacity of the grouting bellows is approximately 10% less than that of the cast specimen when the maximum displacement is achieved. From the testing results, it is seen that the requirements of the overall cast-in-place piers is met as long as the strength of the assembled joint can be guaranteed under the same design parameters.

Key words

bridge engineering / assembly pier / quasi-static test / seismic performance / grouting bellows connection / numerical analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
BAO Long-sheng, ZHANG Yuan-bao, SANG Zhong-wei, YU Ling. Quasi-static Test and Numerical Simulation Analysis for Seismic Performance of Fabricated Assemble Bridge Piers Base on Bellows Connection(in English)[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(12): 242-249

References

[1] NCHRP 20-7(193) Task 12, Recommended LRFD Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Highway Bridges[S].
[2] PALERMO A, PAMPANIN S, MARRIOTT D. Design, Modeling, and Experimental Response of Seismic Resistant Bridge Piers with Posttensioned Dissipating Connections[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(11):1648-1661.
[3] PANG J B K, STEUCK K P, COHAGEN L, et al. Rapidly Constructible Large-bar Precast Bridge-bent Seismic Connection[R]. Olympia:Washington State Department of Transportation, 2008.
[4] ELSAYED M, NEHDI M L. Experimental and Analytical Study on Grouted Duct Connections in Precast Concrete Construction[J]. Materials & Structures, 2017, 50(4):198-212.
[5] 姜洪斌,张海顺,刘文清,等.预制混凝土结构插入式预留孔灌浆钢筋锚固性能[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2011,43(4):28-31. JIANG Hong-bin, ZHANG Hai-shun, LIU Wen-qing, et al. Experimental Study on Plug-in Filling Hole for Steel Bar Anchorage of the PC Structure[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011, 43(4):28-31.
[6] 王志强,卫张震,魏红一,等.预制拼装联接件形式对桥墩抗震性能的影响[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(5):74-80. WANG Zhi-qiang, WEI Zhang-zhen, WEI Hong-yi, et al. Influence of Precast Segmental Connector Forms on Seismic Performance of Bridge Pier[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(5):74-80.
[7] 陈云钢,刘家彬,郭正兴,等.预制混凝土结构波纹管浆锚钢筋锚固性能试验研究[J].建筑技术,2014,45(1):65-67. CHEN Yun-gang, LIU Jia-bin, GUO Zheng-xing, et al. Experimental Study on Grouting Connection in Bellows for Steel Bar Anchorage of Precast Concrete Structure[J]. Architecture Technology, 2014, 45(1):65-67.
[8] 姜海西,王志强,沈佳伟.灌浆金属波纹管连接预制拼装立柱抗震性能试验研究[J].结构工程师,2016,32(5):132-138. JIANG Hai-xi, WANG Zhi-qiang, SHEN Jia-wei. Anti-seismic Performance Testing of Prefabricate Assembly Pillars Connected with Grouting Metal Corrugated Pipe[J]. Structural Engineers, 2016, 32(5):132-138.
[9] 黄宜.装配式钢筋混凝土桥墩抗震性能研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2016. HUANG Yi. Study on Seismic Performance of Precast Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2016.
[10] 葛继平,王志强,李建中,等.装配式预应力混凝土双柱桥墩抗震性能研究进展[J].地震工程与工程振动,2013,33(3):192-198. GE Ji-ping, WANG Zhi-qiang, LI Jian-zhong, et al. Recent Development in Seismic Performance of Prestressed Concrete Precast Segmental Double-column Piers[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 33(3):192-198.
[11] GB/T 228-2002,金属材料室温拉伸试验方法[S]. GB/T 228-2002, Metal Materials-Tensile Testing at Ambient Temperature[S].
[12] 倪娜.整浇装配式预应力桥墩抗震性能有限元分析[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2013. NI Na. Finite Element Analysis on Seismic Behavior of Prefabricated Piers with Prestressing[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology, 2013.
[13] ŽIDONIS I. Strength Calculation Method for Cross-section of Reinforced Concrete Flexural Member Using Curvilinear Concrete Stress Diagram of EN-2[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 57(1):1309-1318.
[14] ELLOBODY E, YOUNG B. Numerical Simulation of Concrete Encased Steel Composite Columns[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011, 67(2):211-222.
[15] 刘涛涛.桥墩延性抗震设计的安全性评价[D].成都:西南交通大学,2011. LIU Tao-tao. The Safety Evaluation of Bridge Pier for the Ductility Seismic Design[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011.
[16] 刘少乾.预应力节段拼装混凝土桥墩拟静力试验研究及数值分析[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2014. LIU Shao-qian. Experimental Study and Numerical Analysis on Prestressed Precast Segmental Concrete Bridge Piers[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2014.
[17] 李芳宝.基于性能抗震设计中的桥墩残余位移问题[D].北京:北京交通大学,2007. LI Fang-bao. Residual Displacement in Performance-based Seismic Design of Bridge Pier[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2007.
[18] 赵彦,谢长旺,姜虹羽,等.矩形空心钢筋混凝土桥墩抗震性能试验研究综述[J].防灾科技学院学报,2010,12(2):17-20. ZHAO Yan, XIE Chang-wang, JIANG Hong-yu, et al. Overview of Experimental Studies on Seismic Performance of Rectangular Hollow Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers[J]. Journal of Institute of Disaster-prevention Science and Technology, 2010, 12(2):17-20.
[19] 程中娜.基于ABAQUS的智能有限元分析前处理技术研究[D].济南:山东大学,2017. CHENG Zhong-na. Research on Intelligent Technologies of Finite Element Analysis Preprocessing Based on ABAQUS[D]. Jinan:Shandong University, 2017.
PDF Full Text Download(4340 KB)

2011

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/