为了丰富人车碰撞事故运动学理论，同时为面包车碰撞行人事故的分析鉴定提供理论支撑，对20～110 km·h-1车辆碰撞速度下行人被面包车碰撞后的运动规律进行研究。利用多刚体建模系统PC-Crash软件构建面包车与行人碰撞仿真模型，并通过仿真获得多种碰撞条件下行人碰撞后的纵向/横向抛距、抛射高度、抛射角度、空中旋转圈数、躯干合成速度和头部合成加速度等运动学数据。结合国家车辆事故深度调查体系（NAIS）中14例具有可靠数据的事故样本进行比较验证。定义并提出了行人被面包车碰撞后的拱推型运动形态，以区别于长头车碰撞的卷绕型和平头车碰撞的推掷型。结果表明：拱推型碰撞中行人会在瞬间被加速到车辆碰撞速度的111%～127%；在高速（110 km·h-1）碰撞中，头部合成加速度值超过3 000 m·s-2，头部损伤指标（HIC）值超过7 500；行人空中旋转不超过3圈，被抛高度不超过4.0 m，抛射角度介于6°～11°；行人抛距与车辆碰撞速度之间的关系可以用幂函数模型进行描述；碰撞接触位置、车型外廓参数、行人行走速度和行人碰撞姿势对行人被抛运动形态有一定程度的影响，相对标准碰撞的影响程度一般在5%以内，最大不超过10%（边翻型除外）；行人头部损伤安全界限（HIC值为1 000）对应的车辆碰撞速度约为55 km·h-1；边翻型碰撞中行人的运动形态与拱推型差别较大，横向抛距最大可达12.0 m。
Abstract
To enrich the kinematics theory of vehicle-pedestrian accidents, and provide support for technical analysis of minivan-pedestrian accidents, the post-impact kinematics of a pedestrian impacted by a minivan at an impact speed of 20-110 km·h-1 were investigated. PC-Crash, a multi-body-based accident modeling system, was used to construct simulation models of collisions between minivans and pedestrians; in addition, simulation tests using various groups of impact parameters were also carried out to produce post-impact kinematics data on pedestrians including the longitudinal/lateral throw distance, projection height, launch angle, rotation number, velocity of the pedestrian torso, and head acceleration. Reliable data on fourteen real-world accidents from the national automobile accident investigation system (NAIS) database were selected to verify the simulation results. arch projection was originally proposed and defined to describe the projection of pedestrians impacted by minivans in order to distinguish from wrap projection of pedestrians impacted by long-fronted vehicles, and forward projection of pedestrians impacted by plane-nosed vehicles. The results show that an impacted pedestrian will instantly be accelerated at up to 111%-127% of the impact speed of the vehicle in arch projection. The value of the head acceleration will exceed 3 000 m·s-2, and the value of the head injury criterion (HIC) will exceed 7 500 in high-speed impacts (110 km·h-1). The number of rotations in air does not exceed 3.0, the projection height does not exceed 4.0 m, and the launch angle is between 6° and 11°. The relationship between the pedestrian throw distance and the vehicle impact speed can be described using a power formula. In addition, the contact position, profile parameter of the vehicle front, pedestrian's walking speed, and impact posture have a certain extent effect on the pedestrian's projection kinematics (except for fender vault), and the extent of such influences is generally less than 5% (the maximum not exceeding 10%) in a typical arch projection. The corresponding speed for the safety threshold of a head injury (the value of HIC is 1 000) is approximately 55 km·h-1. The projection kinematics of fender vault has a large difference with arch projection, and the longest lateral throw distance of fender vault can reach up to 12.0 m.
关键词
汽车工程 /
运动学规律 /
事故仿真 /
面包车 /
拱推型碰撞 /
NAIS
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
automotive engineering /
kinematics regularity /
accident simulation /
minivan /
arch projection /
NAIS
{{custom_keyword}} /
中图分类号：
U467.14
{{custom_clc.code}}
({{custom_clc.text}})
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 交通运输部公路科学研究院,中瑞交通安全研究中心.2015年中国道路交通安全蓝皮书[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2016. Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, China-Sweden Traffic Safety Research Center. The Blue Book of Road Safety in China 2015[M]. Beijing:China Communications Press, 2016.
[2] 冯浩,陈建国,张志勇,等.道路交通事故技术鉴定发展概述[J].中国司法鉴定,2015,5:69-73. FENG Hao, CHEN Jian-guo, ZHANG Zhi-yong, et al. The Development of Road Traffic Accident Investigation[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2015, 5:69-73.
[3] APPEL H, STURTZ G, GOTZEN L. Influence of Impact Speed and Vehicle Parameters on Injuries of Children and Adults in Pedestrian Accidents[C]//IRCOBI. Proceeding of IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury. Zurich:IRCOBI, 1975:83-100.
[4] RAVANI B, BROUGHAM D, MASON R T. Pedestrian Post-impact Kinematics and Injury Patterns[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 1983, 14(3):137-138.
[5] SEARLE J A. The Physics of Throw Distance in Accident Reconstruction[J]. SAE Paper 930659.
[6] WOOD D P, WALSH D G. Pedestrian Forward Projection Impact[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2002, 7(3):285-306.
[7] SIMMS C K, WOOD D P, WALSH D G. Confidence Limits for Impact Speed Estimation from Pedestrian Projection Distance[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2004, 9(2):219-228.
[8] UNTAROIU C D, SHIN J, IVARSSON J, et al. A Study of the Pedestrian Impact Kinematics Using Finite Element Dummy Models:The Corridors and Dimensional Analysis Scaling of Upper-body Trajectories[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2008, 13(5):469-478.
[9] MIN K D. A Study on the Factors that Influence the Throw Distance of Pedestrian on the Vehicle-pedestrian Accident[J]. Journal of the Korean Society for Power System Engineering, 2009, 13(2):56-62.
[10] MORADI R, LANKARANI H M. Evaluation of the Kinematics and Injury Potential to Different Sizes of Pedestrians Impacted by a Utility Vehicle with a Frontal Guard[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2011, 16(6):645-655.
[11] PENG Y, DECK C, YANG J K, et al. Effects of Pedestrian Gait, Vehicle-front Geometry and Impact Velocity on Kinematics of Adult and Child Pedestrian Head[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2012, 17(5):553-561.
[12] WOOD D P, ELLIOTT J R, LYONS M, et al. Predicting the Pedestrian Pre-impact Speed from the Pedestrian Projection Distance and Vehicle Damage Measurements[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D, 2013, 227(2):164-178.
[13] KWON S M, CHANG H B. Analysis of Pedestrian-thrown Distance Pattern by Pedestrian-vehicle Collision Position[J]. The Journal of the Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, 2017, 16(1):90-100.
[14] 范艳辉,许洪国,董金松.汽车行人碰撞接触中行人运动学规律仿真研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2009,19(1):45-51. FAN Yan-hui, XU Hong-guo, DONG Jin-song. Simulation on the Kinematics Laws of Pedestrian in the Contacting Phase of the Collision Between Vehicle and Pedestrian[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009, 19(1):45-51.
[15] 蒋阳,黄海波.人车碰撞中行人损伤影响因素研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(3):95-99. JIANG Yang, HUANG Hai-bo. A Study on Multiple Factors Affecting Pedestrian Injury in Pedestrian-car Collision Accident[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(3):95-99.
[16] MOSER A, STEFFAN H, KASANICKY G. The Pedestrian Model in PC-Crash-The Introduction of a Multi Body System and Its Validation[J]. SAE Paper 1999-01-0445.
[17] MOSER A, STEFFAN H. Validation of the PC-Crash Pedestrian Model[J]. SAE Paper 2000-01-0847.
[18] 国家卫生计生委疾病预防控制局.中国居民营养与慢性病状况报告(2015年)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2015. Bureau of Disease Prevention and Control of National Health and Family Planning Commission. Report on the Status of Nutrition and Chronic Diseases in China 2015[M]. Beijing:People's Medical Publishing House, 2015.
[19] FRANCK H, FRANCK D. Mathematical Methods for Accident Reconstruction-A Forensic Engineering Perspective[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 2010.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
国家自然科学基金项目（11402214）；汽车测控与安全四川省重点实验室开放研究基金项目（szjj2015-044）；四川省教育厅自然重点科研项目（16ZA0162）
{{custom_fund}}
{{custom_fund}}
PDF全文下载(3572 KB)
