预制拼装桥面板湿接缝构造形式及其性能研究进展

胡梦涵, 贾振雷, 韩强, 杜修力, 惠斌

中国公路学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2) : 147-163.

PDF全文下载(5011 KB)
PDF全文下载(5011 KB)
中国公路学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2) : 147-163. DOI: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2025.02.012
桥梁工程

预制拼装桥面板湿接缝构造形式及其性能研究进展

  • 胡梦涵1, 贾振雷2, 韩强3, 杜修力3, 惠斌4
作者信息 +

Review of Configurations and Performance of Wet Joints for Prefabricated Bridge Deck Panels

  • HU Meng-han1, JIA Zhen-lei2, HAN Qiang3, DU Xiu-li3, HUI Bin4
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

预制拼装桥面板以施工速度快，低碳环保，对既有交通和周围环境干扰小等优势逐渐成为桥梁工程领域的研究热点之一。预制拼装桥面板的施工速度、整体性和耐久性主要取决于接缝形式、构造与材料等。湿接缝以其现场浇筑量小，施工容差大，整体性能好等优势逐渐成为预制拼装桥面板普遍采用的接缝形式。对预制拼装桥面板湿接缝的研究进行了较为系统的梳理和总结。首先介绍了常见湿接缝的类型和性能，并阐述了基于高性能材料湿接缝的构造形式和力学性能，重点探讨了预埋钢筋湿接缝和预应力湿接缝的抗弯、抗剪和抗拉承载力预测模型与计算方法；在此基础上，通过实际工程应用与实践阐明了预制拼装桥面板湿接缝的工程应用价值；指出了预制拼装桥面板湿接缝的发展趋势和进一步需要开展的研究工作。结果表明：基于高性能材料，研发性能优越、构造简单、施工便捷且兼顾经济性的湿接缝连接构造仍然是前提，创新性的湿接缝在弯矩、剪力和疲劳等作用下的工作机制、失效机理和力学性能预测模型及计算公式等是基础，预制拼装桥面板湿接缝面向工程的实用设计方法等是关键。

Abstract

Prefabricated bridge deck panels (PBDPs) are easily constructed, are associated with lower pollution levels, and cause minimum disruptions in existing traffic and the surrounding environment. Owing to these advantages, they are gradually becoming the research focus of bridge engineering. Configurations and materials of joints have significant effects on the speed of construction, integrity, and durability of PBDPs. Wet joints, with their small amounts of grout, high tolerance for construction errors, and superior mechanical properties, have gradually become commonly used joint types for PBDPs. Herein, previously published research studies on wet joints for PBDPs are systematically summarized. The configurations and performance of common wet joints are introduced first. The designs and behaviors of wet joints with high-performance materials are then clarified. The prediction models for the capacity of bar connections and post-tensioned connections subjected to bending moments, shear, and tension are discussed. The practical engineering values of the wet joints are demonstrated based on engineering practices. Finally, the development trends and future research directions of wet joints for PBDPs are pointed out. Based on high-performance materials, the novel configurations of the wet joints associated with superior performance, simple and convenient construction approaches, and economic efficiency, constitute the premise of future studies. Working mechanisms, failure modes, and performance prediction models of novel wet joints subjected to bending moment, shear, and fatigue loading are the basis for future works. In addition, a practical engineering-oriented design method of wet joints for PBDPs is the focus to be investigated. This paper can provide a broad view and technical support for the application of PBDPs.

关键词

桥梁工程 / 预制拼装桥面板湿接缝 / 综述 / 高性能土木工程材料 / 力学性能 / 分析模型

Key words

bridge engineering / wet joints for PBDPs / review / high-performance material / mechanical property / analytical model

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用
胡梦涵, 贾振雷, 韩强, 杜修力, 惠斌. 预制拼装桥面板湿接缝构造形式及其性能研究进展[J]. 中国公路学报, 2025, 38(2): 147-163 https://doi.org/10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2025.02.012
HU Meng-han, JIA Zhen-lei, HAN Qiang, DU Xiu-li, HUI Bin. Review of Configurations and Performance of Wet Joints for Prefabricated Bridge Deck Panels[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2025, 38(2): 147-163 https://doi.org/10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2025.02.012
中图分类号： U443.3   

参考文献

[1] LI C, BI K M, HAO H, et al. Cyclic test and numerical study of precast segmental concrete columns with BFRP and TEED [J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 17(6): 3475-3494.
[2] HÄLLMARK R, WHITE H, COLLIN P. Prefabricated bridge construction across Europe and America [J]. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 2012, 17 (3): 82-92.
[3] 王莉莉.钢-混组合桥梁预制桥面板湿接缝构造及传力研究[D].西安:长安大学,2017. WANG Li-li. Research on the wet joints structure and force transfer of prefabricated deck in steel and concrete composite bridge [D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2017.
[4] 李国平,胡 皓,任 才,等.桥梁混凝土结构接缝的耐久性能[J].土木工程学报,2018,51(7):98-103. LI Guo-ping, HU Hao, REN Cai, et al. Study on durability of joints in concrete bridge structures [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018, 51 (7): 98-103.
[5] ISSA M A, YOUSIF A A, ISSA M A, et al. Field performance of full depth precast concrete panels in bridge deck reconstruction [J]. PCI Journal, 1995, 40 (3): 82-108.
[6] JIANG H B, CHEN L, MA Z J, et al. Shear behavior of dry joints with castellated keys in precast concrete segmental bridges [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2015, 20 (2): 04014062.
[7] YANG I H, KIM K C, KIM Y J. Shear strength of dry joints in precast concrete modules [C] // ASCE. Proceedings of the Thirteenth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC-13). New York: ASCE, 2013: I-5-3.
[8] PORTER S D, JULANDER J L, HALLING M W, et al. Flexural testing of precast bridge deck panel connections [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2011, 16 (3): 422-430.
[9] PORTER S D, LOGAN JULANDER J, HALLING M W, et al. Shear testing of precast bridge deck panel transverse connections [J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2012, 26 (4): 462-468.
[10] SHAH B N, SENNAH K, KIANOUSH M R, et al. Experimental study on prefabricated concrete bridge girder-to-girder intermittent bolted connections system [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2007, 12 (5): 570-584.
[11] ZHAO C H, WANG K K, XU R Y, et al. Development of fully prefabricated steel-UHPC composite deck system [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2019, 145 (7): 04019051.
[12] MA Z G, CAO Q, CHAPMAN C E, et al. Longitudinal joint details with tight bend diameter U-bars [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2012, 109 (6): 815-824.
[13] MA Z J, LEWIS S, CAO Q, et al. Transverse joint details with tight bend diameter U-bars for accelerated bridge construction [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2012, 138 (6): 697-707.
[14] SHIM C S, CHOI K Y, CHANG S P. Design of transverse joints in composite bridges with precast decks [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2001, 5 (1): 17-27.
[15] OESTERLE R G, ELREMAILY A F, MA Z G. Design and construction guidelines for long-span decked precast, prestress concrete girder bridges [R]. Tennessee: NCHRP, 2009.
[16] LEE J K, LEE S H. Flexural behavior of UHPFRC moment connection for precast concrete decks [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2015, 112 (4): 451-462.
[17] DENG Y H, PHARES B M, PUTZ A J, et al. Performance evaluation of longitudinal ultrahigh-performance concrete closure pour connection for use in modular bridge construction: pairwise comparison of capacity and ductility at failure limit state [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016, 2592 (1): 65-75.
[18] HU M H, JIA Z L, HAN Q, et al. Shear behavior of innovative high performance joints for precast concrete deck panels [J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 261: 114307.
[19] HU M H, JIA Z L, HAN Q, et al. Application of CFRP tendons to novel connections of precast concrete deck panels: Experiments and analytical models [J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2023, 27 (1): 04022085.
[20] HU M H, JIA Z L, XU L, et al. Flexural performance predictions of prefabricated bridge deck panels connected with CFRP tendons and UHPC grout [J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 285: 116024.
[21] 胡梦涵,韩 强,贾振雷,等.基于高性能材料接缝的预制拼装桥面板力学性能[J].土木工程学报,2023,56(7):69-81,91. HU Meng-han, HAN Qiang, JIA Zhen-lei, et al. Mechanical behaviors of precast bridge deck panels with high performance connections [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2023, 56 (7) : 69-81, 91.
[22] CARTER J W, PILGRIM T, HUBBARD F K, et al. Wisconsin's use of full-depth precast concrete deck panels keeps interstate 90 open to traffic [J]. PCI Journal, 2007, 52 (1): 16-30.
[23] PERRY V, KRISCIUNAS R, STOFKO B. Mackenzie river twin bridges [J]. PCI Journal, 2014, 59 (2): 40-48.
[24] ARAFA A, FARGHALY A S, AHMED E A, et al. Laboratory testing of GFRP-RC panels with UHPFRC joints of the Nipigon River cable-stayed bridge in northwest Ontario, Canada [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21 (11): 05016006.
[25] QI J N, BAO Y, WANG J Q, et al. Flexural behavior of an innovative dovetail UHPC joint in composite bridges under negative bending moment [J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 200: 109716.
[26] UDOT—2008， Utah department of transportation. Full depth precast concrete deck panel standard drawings [S].
[27] AASHTO—2013, AASHTO LRFD Bridge design specifications [S].
[28] JTG 3362—2018,公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范[S]. JTG 3362—2018, Specifications for design of highway reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts [S].
[29] MARTIN L D, OSBORN A. Connections for modular precast concrete bridge decks [R]. Mclean: Federal Highway Administration, 1983.
[30] CULMO M. Connection details for prefabricated bridge elements and systems [R]. Mclean: Federal Highway Administration Office of Bridge Technology, 2009.
[31] STANTON J, MATTOCK A. Load distribution and connection design for precast stemmed multibeam bridge superstructures [R]. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board, 1986.
[32] JONES H L. Lateral connections for double tee bridges [R]. Texas: Texas A & M University System, 2001.
[33] PORTER S D. Laboratory testing of precast bridge deck panel transverse connections for use in accelerated bridge construction [D]. Logan: Utah State University, 2009.
[34] JULANDER J L. Finite element modeling of full depth precast concrete transverse bridge deck connections [D]. Logan: Utah State University, 2009.
[35] LI L G, MA Z J, GRIFFEY M E, et al. Improved longitudinal joint details in decked bulb tees for accelerated bridge construction: Concept development [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2010, 15 (3): 327-336.
[36] RYU H K, KIM Y J, CHANG S P. Experimental study on static and fatigue strength of loop joints [J]. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29 (2): 145-162.
[37] BRUSH N C. Connection of modular steel beam precast slab units with cast-in-place closure pour slabs [D]. Texas: Texas A&M University, 2005.
[38] CHAPMAN C E. Behavior of precast bridge deck joints with small bend diameter U-bars [D]. Tennessee: University of Tennessee, 2010.
[39] LEWIS S. Experimental investigation of precast bridge deck joints with U-bar and headed bar joint details [D]. Tennessee: University of Tennessee, 2009.
[40] SWENTY M K. The Investigation of transverse joints and grouts on full depth concrete bridge deck panels [D]. Blacksburg： Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2009.
[41] ONG K C G, HAO J B, PARAMASIVAM P. Flexural behavior of precast joints with horizontal loop connections [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2006, 103 (5): 664-671.
[42] HE Z Q, MA Z J, CHAPMAN C E, et al. Longitudinal joints with accelerated construction features in decked bulb-tee girder bridges: Strut-and-tie model and design guidelines [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18 (5): 372-379.
[43] RYU H K, CHANG S P, KIM Y J, et al. Crack control of a steel and concrete composite plate girder with prefabricated slabs under hogging moments [J]. Engineering Structures, 2005, 27 (11): 1613-1624.
[44] ONG K C G, HAO J B, PARAMASIVAM P. A strut-and-tie model for ultimate loads of precast concrete joints with loop connections in tension [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2006, 20 (3): 169-176.
[45] ZHU P, MA Z J, CAO Q, et al. Fatigue evaluation of transverse U-bar joint details for accelerated bridge construction [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2012, 17 (2): 191-200.
[46] THOMPSON M K, LEDESMA A, JIRSA J E, et al. Lap splices anchored by headed bars [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2006, 103 (2): 271-279.
[47] LI L G, MA Z J, OESTERLE R G. Improved longitudinal joint details in decked bulb tees for accelerated bridge construction: Fatigue evaluation [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2010, 15 (5): 511-522.
[48] THOMPSON M K, LEDESMA A L, JIRSA J O, et al. Anchorage behavior of headed reinforcement-part A: Lap splices part B: Design provisions and summary [R]. Texas: Texas Department of Transportation, 2003.
[49] 李智斌.带锚固板钢筋机械锚固性能的试验研究[D].天津:天津大学,2007. LI Zhi-bin. Experiment study in anchorage behavior of headed reinforcement [D].Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2007.
[50] 庞 丹.新型非连续钢筋接缝的力学性能研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2018. PANG Dan. Study on mechanical properties of improved discontinuous reinforced joints [D].Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018.
[51] LI L G, JIANG Z X. Flexural behavior and strut-and-tie model of joints with headed bar details connecting precast members [J]. Perspectives in Science, 2016, 7: 253-260.
[52] 苏庆田,胡一鸣,田 乐,等.用于组合梁桥面板湿接缝的弧形钢筋连接构造[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(9):86-92. SU Qing-tian, HU Yi-ming, TIAN Le, et al. Curved bar connection configuration used for wet joints of deck of composite girder [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30 (9): 86-92.
[53] BADIE S S, BAISHYA M C, TADROS M K. NUDECK an efficient and economical precast prestressed bridge deck system [J]. PCI Journal, 1998, 43 (5): 56-74.
[54] GUO J, DENG K L, HE M H, et al. Experimental study on the construction stages of an RC closure pour in bridge widening [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2017, 22 (12): 06017007.
[55] GORDON S R, MAY I M. Development of in situ joints for pre-cast bridge deck units [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-bridge Engineering, 2006, 159 (1): 17-30.
[56] EINEA A, YEHIA S, TADROS M K. Lap splices in confined concrete [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1999, 96 (6): 947-955.
[57] BADIE S S, BAISHYA M C, TADROS M K. NUDECK-a new prestressed stay-in-place concrete panel for bridge decks [C] // ACM. 1998 Transportation Conference Proceedings. Ames: ACM, 1998: 45-50.
[58] RIZKALLA S H, SERRETTE R L, HEUVEL J S, et al. Multiple shear key connections for precast shear wall panels [J]. PCI Journal, 1989, 34 (2): 104-120.
[59] KIM Y C, PARK J J. Shear strength of grout type transverse joint [J]. KCI Concrete Journal, 2002, 14 (1): 8-14.
[60] KIM Y C, SHIN S, PARK J J. Shear and fatigue strength of grout-type transverse joints [J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2003, 30 (4): 607-614.
[61] ACI 318-19, Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary [S].
[62] JSCE—2004, Recommendations for design and construction of ultra-high strength fiber reinforced concrete structures [S].
[63] JSCE—2007, Standard specifications for concrete structures-2007: Design [S].
[64] AASHTO—2017, AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications [S].
[65] KIM H S, CHIN W J, CHO J R, et al. An experimental study on the behavior of shear keys according to the curing time of UHPC [J]. Engineering, 2015, 7 (4): 212-218.
[66] KIM Y J, CHIN W J, JEON S J. Interface shear strength at joints of ultra-high performance concrete structures [J]. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2018, 12 (1): 59.
[67] LEE C H, KIM Y J, CHIN W J, et al. Shear strength of ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) precast bridge joint [C] // PARRA-MONTESINOS G J, REINHARDT H W, NAAMAN A E. High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement Composites 6. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012: 413-420.
[68] HU M H, HAN Q, WU S W, et al. Shear capacity of precast concrete shear keys with ultrahigh-performance concrete for connections [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2021, 26 (7): 04021036.
[69] HUSSEIN H H, SARGAND S M, AL RIKABI F T, et al. Laboratory evaluation of ultrahigh-performance concrete shear key for prestressed adjacent precast concrete box girder bridges [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2017, 22 (2): 04016113.
[70] HUSSEIN H H, SARGAND S M, STEINBERG E P. Shape optimization of UHPC shear keys for precast, prestressed, adjacent box-girder bridges [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23 (4): 04018009.
[71] SWENTY M K, ROBERTS-WOLLMANN C L, COUSINS T E. Transverse panel-to-panel connections for full-depth precast concrete bridge deck panels on continuous steel girder bridges: part 1, experimental [J]. PCI Journal, 2014, 59 (2): 62-77.
[72] ISSA M A, YOUSIF A A, LSSA M A, et al. Analysis of full depth precast concrete bridge deck panels [J]. PCI Journal, 1998, 43 (1): 74-85.
[73] ISSA M A, ANDERSON R, DOMAGALSKI T, et al. Full-scale testing of prefabricated full-depth precast concrete bridge deck panel system [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2007, 104 (3): 324-332.
[74] ROBERTS K S. Performance of transverse post-tensioned joints subjected to negative bending and shear stresses on full scale, full depth, precast concrete bridge deck system [D]. Logan: Utah State University, 2011.
[75] WELLS Z G, BARR P J, JAMES P H. Performance of posttensioned curved-strand connections in transverse joints of precast deck panels [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18 (10): 1062-1073.
[76] GOPAL B A, HEJAZI F, HAFEZOLGHORANI M, et al. Shear strength of dry and epoxy joints for ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2020, 117 (1): 279-288.
[77] WANG D H, SHI C J, WU Z M, et al. A review on ultra high performance concrete: Part II hydration, microstructure and properties [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 96: 368-377.
[78] JANG H O, LEE H S, CHO K, et al. Experimental study on shear performance of plain construction joints integrated with ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 152: 16-23.
[79] FAN W, SHEN D J, YANG T, et al. Experimental and numerical study on low-velocity lateral impact behaviors of RC, UHPFRC and UHPFRC-strengthened columns [J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 191: 509-525.
[80] AALETI S, SRITHARAN S. Design of ultrahigh-performance concrete waffle deck for accelerated bridge construction [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014, 2406 (1): 12-22.
[81] 张永涛,田 飞.预制桥面板UHPC-U形钢筋湿接缝受力性能试验研究[J].桥梁建设,2018,48(5):48-52. ZHANG Yong-tao, TIAN Fei. Test study of mechanical behavior of UHPC-U shape reinforcement wet joint of precast deck slabs [J]. Bridge Construction, 2018, 48 (5): 48-52.
[82] GRAYBEAL B A. Behavior of field-cast ultra-high performance concrete bridge deck connections under cyclic and static structural loading [R]. Mclean: Federal Highway Administration, 2010.
[83] PERRY V, ROYCE M. Innovative field-cast UHPC joints for precast bridge decks (full-depth precast deck panels), oneonta, NY-design, prototype testing and construction [J]. Designing and Building with UHPFRC, 2010, 4: 421-436.
[84] HABER Z B, GRAYBEAL B A. Lap-spliced rebar connections with UHPC closures [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23 (6): 04018028.
[85] SHERIF M M. Flexure strength prediction of closure strip between prefabricated deck slabs supported over bridge girders incorporating GFRP bars and UHPFRC [D]. Toronto: Ryerson University, 2017.
[86] AHMED M S S. Development and study of closure strip between precast deck panels in accelerated bridge construction [D]. Toronto: Ryerson University, 2016.
[87] WEBER E D, PANTELIDES C P, REAVELEY L D. Shear capacity of CFRP posttensioned grouted transverse joints under concentrated loads [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21 (7): 04016040.
[88] CSA—2012, Design and construction of building components with fiber-reinforced polymers [S].
[89] WATANABE N, MUSHA H, YOSHINAGA K. Design and performance tests for bridge using ultra high strength fiber reinforced concrete [R]. Tsukuba: US-Japan Bridge Engineering Workshop, 2007.
[90] JSCE—2010, Standard specifications for concrete structures—2010: Design [S].
[91] SHIN J. Ultra-high performance concrete (UHCP) precast segmental bridges [D]. Hamburg: Technische Universität Hamburg, 2016.
[92] ACI 318-14, Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary [S].
[93] SAENZ N, PANTELIDES C P, REAVELEY L D. Strut-and-tie model for shear friction of concrete with fiber-reinforced polymer composites [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2004, 101 (6): 863-871.
[94] LSSA M A, AHMAD-TALALLDRISS, KASPAR L I, et al. Full depth precast and precast, prestressed concrete bridge deck panels [J]. PCI Journal, 1995, 40 (1): 59-80.
[95] BISWAS M. Precast bridge deck design systems [J]. PCI Journal, 1986, 31 (2): 40-94.
[96] 胡美韵,孔祥武,朱勇锋,等.钢-UHPC轻型组合连续梁桥设计与施工[J].公路工程,2023,48(2):15-23,47. HU Mei-yun, KONG Xiang-wu, ZHU Yong-feng, et al. Design and construction of steel-UHPC lightweight continuous composite beam bridge [J]. Highway Engineering, 2023, 48 (2): 15-23, 47.
[97] 陈艳良,邵旭东,胡伟业,等.UHPC桥面板现浇接缝的弯拉性能研究[J].公路工程,2020,45(5):123-128. CHEN Yan-liang, SHAO Xu-dong, HU Wei-ye, et al. Study on bending-tensile behavior of cast-in-situ joints of UHPC bridge deck [J]. Highway Engineering, 2020, 45 (5): 123-128.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(52208454，52338010)
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52208454, 52338010)
PDF全文下载(5011 KB)

178

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail
段落导航
相关文章
版权所有 © 《中国公路学报》编辑部
地址：陕西省西安市南二环路中段长安大学内　
邮编：710064　
电话：029-82334387　
E-mail：zgglxb@163.com
技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司

/

〈 〉